<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On Listening and Blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/</link>
	<description>Entrepreneur, Founder, Renaissance Caveman, Heretic, Idea Guy, Crafter of Digital Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:25:03 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jevan Woolley</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-17184</link>
		<dc:creator>Jevan Woolley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/#comment-17184</guid>
		<description>I am suing you for stealing my phrase, Mr. Bohan.  :)  Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am suing you for stealing my phrase, Mr. Bohan.  <img src='http://www.seanbohan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-15933</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/#comment-15933</guid>
		<description>I dont disagree with you - I think we were looking at the problem _all wrong_. I think we didnt give the users enough credit. I think we were approaching this more as a publishing effort and less like a social conversation. We wanted to have enough stories to tell to keep the user engaged and happy without planning for the users input. 

The nice thing is, we can always turn on a dime :)

What I dont want to see is blogs become another outlet for press releases. The only time I care about quarterly reports is when I am researching a stock :)

There is enough corporate cholesterol in the world right now and blogging is a way to get real voices into the conversation. It requires a lot of intestinal fortitude on the part of the clients to both start and support these efforts (especially when something bad happens). 

The thing is, if you dont have feedback loops in place, blogs just become another megaphone - and we have enough of those already (and I am an advertising guy saying that)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont disagree with you &#8211; I think we were looking at the problem _all wrong_. I think we didnt give the users enough credit. I think we were approaching this more as a publishing effort and less like a social conversation. We wanted to have enough stories to tell to keep the user engaged and happy without planning for the users input. </p>
<p>The nice thing is, we can always turn on a dime <img src='http://www.seanbohan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What I dont want to see is blogs become another outlet for press releases. The only time I care about quarterly reports is when I am researching a stock <img src='http://www.seanbohan.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>There is enough corporate cholesterol in the world right now and blogging is a way to get real voices into the conversation. It requires a lot of intestinal fortitude on the part of the clients to both start and support these efforts (especially when something bad happens). </p>
<p>The thing is, if you dont have feedback loops in place, blogs just become another megaphone &#8211; and we have enough of those already (and I am an advertising guy saying that)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Lafferty</title>
		<link>http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-15931</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Lafferty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanbohan.com/2008/01/12/on-listening-and-blogging/#comment-15931</guid>
		<description>Maybe feeding the beast is an albatross whose time has passed. Observing Steve Baker’s discussion in prep to update his 2005 BW cover story about Blogging, http://tinyurl.com/37kjtl, I’m inclined to think feeding the beast may be old school, albeit 2 year old school, especially in the context of the sheer volume of choice available vs. reader time budget.

I think what we’re up against is a fork in the blogging road, where some blogs will serve as update streams of relevant global data in appropriate quantity while others, perhaps published in parallel by the same company, will serve up the chunkier, more personal bits, providing higher quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe feeding the beast is an albatross whose time has passed. Observing Steve Baker’s discussion in prep to update his 2005 BW cover story about Blogging, <a href="http://tinyurl.com/37kjtl" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/37kjtl</a>, I’m inclined to think feeding the beast may be old school, albeit 2 year old school, especially in the context of the sheer volume of choice available vs. reader time budget.</p>
<p>I think what we’re up against is a fork in the blogging road, where some blogs will serve as update streams of relevant global data in appropriate quantity while others, perhaps published in parallel by the same company, will serve up the chunkier, more personal bits, providing higher quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
